Monthly Boost November 2005

Hi there, I can not believe it is November already and time to be celebrate another year of life for me ! Before my celebrations this month I would like to finish off my Monthly Boost part II on ‘hyperactivity to autism’. Last month I covered quite a bit on reducing the child’s ‘toxic burden’. This month I am going to share a case study which I personally learned a lot from not only as a professional but also as a mother….got your ‘cuppa?’ …

I saw a 2.5 year old girl (Chloe) with many health issues, from severe tantrums resulting in banging her head against a wall, to becoming extremely lethargic, being disruptive at nursery, having a very short attention span, experiencing a loss of speech (from previously speaking in sentences), and not seeming to understand basic instructions at times through to physical symptoms, including dry bumpy skin especially on the upper back arms, dark circles under the eyes, ‘viral asthma’, various food allergies (including dairy) and poor nail and hair quality. Initially the mum (Caroline) put it down to the ‘terrible twos’ until the speech deteriorated.

Caroline was convinced that Chloe went into regression after the MMR jab. I personally do not believe there is one cause for such a drastic regression in health, but I do believe that the MMR can be the ‘straw that breaks the camel’s back’ so to speak. I had carried out a body scan on Chloe and monitored for ‘stressors’ and she came up with high mercury, aluminum and a few pesticides. Although Caroline was still adamant that the MMR was the ‘cause’

Let’s think about a few things for a moment…when considering vaccinations:

• When in NATURAL life has a newborn (let alone an adult) been exposed to diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus (DPT) at the same time? …the answer is more than likely 'never'. Does it really make sense then to expose an infant to all three at the same time? let alone the 6 in one jab!
• Most of these infections are picked up orally, by touch, inhalation, etc BUT NOT by direct exposure into the blood stream…..following so far…well to put it in basic terms the vaccines are given by injection straight into the blood stream……is this sensible when most of these diseases are caught by other means?
• Most of these vaccinations require preservatives to keep the vaccine ‘effective’……what are these preservatives? And are they safe to inject into a child’s bloodstream (let alone a newborn’s)?
• If a baby/child is given a vaccine, the immune system should surely recognize it as a foreign invader and react against it.... then why do some babies not show any signs of distress (such as fever or restlessness etc), where has the vaccine load gone?
• If the vaccines are effective, then why do some vaccinated children/babies still get the disease that they have been vaccinated against?
• A baby's immune system is premature and does not mature until the age of 2 years at least, especially the immune cells called the T cells. These cells are still deciding which ‘career path to take in life’ do they want to grow up to be a doctor (suppressor T cell), an architect (cytotoxic T cell) or a house wife (helper T cell)?..whilst they are still making this decision they are suddenly exposed to a host of vaccines. These vaccines FORCE the immune cells to make a decision that they are not ready to make. These T cells are not mature enough until 2 years of life. So if this is the case what happens to the immune system? It is skewed by this? Does it not then make sense to maybe vaccinate later on, when the immune cells have matured?